Home โ€บ Business Intelligence Engineer โ€บ Amazon Business Intelligence Engineer III Interview Questions and...
Business Intelligence Engineer Case Study Company Interview Questions FAANG

Amazon Business Intelligence Engineer III Interview Questions and Answers 2026

Amazon’s BIE III is one of the most rigorous analytics engineering roles in the industry. At Level III, you’re expected to own the full BI stack: data modeling, ETL pipeline design, self-serve reporting infrastructure, and the ability to mentor junior engineers. The interview process includes 4โ€“5 rounds covering advanced SQL, data warehousing concepts, pipeline design, and Amazon’s Leadership Principles.

This guide is built from real BIE interview reports across Amazon’s Retail, AWS, Advertising, and Operations teams. Expect BigQuery/Redshift-style SQL questions, schema design challenges, and pipeline architecture questions at the L5/L6 difficulty level.

๐Ÿ“š Recommended Resources to Crack This Interview

2200 Most Asked Analytics Interview Questions

  • 2,200+ questions ยท 23 topics
  • For: those who want to master all analytics interview topics
โ‚น1,999 โ‚น7,999

Buy Now โ†’

Ace Any SQL Interview

  • 220+ questions ยท SQL advanced, data models, DBMS
  • For: anyone who wants to crack any SQL round (fresher to advanced)
โ‚น799

Buy Now โ†’

Round 1 โ€” Advanced SQL (Redshift / Presto)

Amazon BIE SQL rounds are 60โ€“75 minutes with 3โ€“4 questions. At Level III, questions test advanced window functions, recursive CTEs, and performance-aware query writing. You’re expected to comment on query optimization strategies, not just write correct SQL.

Question 1: Rolling 28-Day Active Buyer Rate

You have events (user_id, event_date, event_type). An “active buyer” is a user who made at least 1 purchase in the last 28 days. Write a query to compute, for each date in 2025, the rolling 28-day active buyer count. The result should have one row per date.

Advanced SQL ยท Window Functions ยท Rolling Aggregation

WITH purchase_dates AS (
  SELECT DISTINCT
    user_id,
    event_date AS purchase_date
  FROM events
  WHERE event_type = 'purchase'
    AND event_date BETWEEN '2024-12-04' AND '2025-12-31'
),
calendar AS (
  SELECT DATEADD(DAY, n, '2025-01-01'::DATE) AS cal_date
  FROM (SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER () - 1 AS n FROM events LIMIT 365)
),
daily_active AS (
  SELECT
    c.cal_date,
    COUNT(DISTINCT p.user_id) AS active_buyers_28d
  FROM calendar c
  LEFT JOIN purchase_dates p
    ON p.purchase_date BETWEEN DATEADD(DAY, -27, c.cal_date)
                           AND c.cal_date
  GROUP BY c.cal_date
)
SELECT
  cal_date,
  active_buyers_28d
FROM daily_active
ORDER BY cal_date;
๐Ÿ’ก Interviewer Focus
The calendar CTE approach is more readable than a self-join approach. The key insight is the date range join: purchase_date between (cal_date – 27 days) and cal_date captures exactly 28 days. In Redshift, DATEADD is the correct function; in BigQuery it would be DATE_ADD.
โ†ช Follow-up Questions
  • โ†’ How would you optimize this query if the events table has 10B rows?
  • โ†’ Rewrite to show the 28-day rate (active buyers / total users) instead of raw count.
  • โ†’ How would you detect the “weekend dip” pattern in this time series?

Question 2: SCD Type 2 โ€” Find Current and Historical Price

You have a product_prices table implementing SCD Type 2: (product_id, price, effective_from, effective_to, is_current). For each order in orders (order_id, product_id, order_date, quantity), join to the price that was active on the order_date. Then, for each product, show the current price and the price 90 days ago โ€” and flag products where price increased by more than 20%.

SCD Type 2 ยท Data Warehousing ยท Price History

-- Part 1: Join orders to price-on-order-date
WITH order_prices AS (
  SELECT
    o.order_id,
    o.product_id,
    o.order_date,
    o.quantity,
    p.price AS price_at_order_date,
    o.quantity * p.price AS revenue
  FROM orders o
  JOIN product_prices p
    ON o.product_id = p.product_id
   AND o.order_date >= p.effective_from
   AND o.order_date <  COALESCE(p.effective_to, '9999-12-31')
),

-- Part 2: Current price vs 90-days-ago price per product
current_price AS (
  SELECT product_id, price AS current_price
  FROM product_prices
  WHERE is_current = TRUE
),
price_90d_ago AS (
  SELECT DISTINCT
    product_id,
    FIRST_VALUE(price) OVER (
      PARTITION BY product_id
      ORDER BY effective_from DESC
    ) AS price_90d
  FROM product_prices
  WHERE effective_from <= DATEADD(DAY, -90, CURRENT_DATE)
    AND COALESCE(effective_to, '9999-12-31') > DATEADD(DAY, -90, CURRENT_DATE)
)
SELECT
  c.product_id,
  c.current_price,
  p.price_90d,
  ROUND((c.current_price - p.price_90d) * 100.0 / NULLIF(p.price_90d, 0), 1) AS pct_change,
  CASE WHEN c.current_price > p.price_90d * 1.20 THEN 'PRICE SPIKE' ELSE 'STABLE' END AS status
FROM current_price c
LEFT JOIN price_90d_ago p USING (product_id)
ORDER BY pct_change DESC;
๐Ÿ’ก Interviewer Focus
SCD Type 2 date range joins are a BIE core skill. The COALESCE(effective_to, '9999-12-31') pattern is the standard way to handle open-ended records (current rows). Using FIRST_VALUE for the 90-day-ago price is cleaner than a subquery; both are acceptable approaches.

Question 3: Funnel Drop-off with Session Reconstruction

You have page_events (session_id, user_id, event_time, page_name). A conversion funnel is: HomePage โ†’ ProductPage โ†’ AddToCart โ†’ Checkout โ†’ Purchase. Write a query to compute the step-by-step funnel conversion rate. Each user must hit steps in order within the same session. A user who hits Checkout before AddToCart should not count as an AddToCart conversion.

Advanced SQL ยท Funnel Analysis ยท Ordered Events

WITH funnel_steps AS (
  SELECT
    session_id,
    user_id,
    MAX(CASE WHEN page_name = 'HomePage'    THEN event_time END) AS home_time,
    MAX(CASE WHEN page_name = 'ProductPage' THEN event_time END) AS product_time,
    MAX(CASE WHEN page_name = 'AddToCart'   THEN event_time END) AS cart_time,
    MAX(CASE WHEN page_name = 'Checkout'    THEN event_time END) AS checkout_time,
    MAX(CASE WHEN page_name = 'Purchase'    THEN event_time END) AS purchase_time
  FROM page_events
  GROUP BY session_id, user_id
),
ordered_funnel AS (
  SELECT
    session_id,
    user_id,
    home_time     IS NOT NULL                             AS hit_home,
    product_time  > home_time                             AS hit_product,
    cart_time     > product_time                          AS hit_cart,
    checkout_time > cart_time                             AS hit_checkout,
    purchase_time > checkout_time                         AS hit_purchase
  FROM funnel_steps
  WHERE home_time IS NOT NULL
)
SELECT
  COUNT(*)                                          AS sessions_started,
  COUNTIF(hit_product)                             AS product_page,
  COUNTIF(hit_cart)                                AS add_to_cart,
  COUNTIF(hit_checkout)                            AS checkout,
  COUNTIF(hit_purchase)                            AS purchase,
  ROUND(COUNTIF(hit_product)  * 100.0 / COUNT(*),1) AS home_to_product_pct,
  ROUND(COUNTIF(hit_cart)     * 100.0 / NULLIF(COUNTIF(hit_product),0),1) AS product_to_cart_pct,
  ROUND(COUNTIF(hit_checkout) * 100.0 / NULLIF(COUNTIF(hit_cart),0),1)    AS cart_to_checkout_pct,
  ROUND(COUNTIF(hit_purchase) * 100.0 / NULLIF(COUNTIF(hit_checkout),0),1) AS checkout_to_purchase_pct
FROM ordered_funnel;
๐Ÿ’ก Interviewer Focus
The ordered comparison (product_time > home_time) enforces the sequence requirement โ€” a user who lands on ProductPage before HomePage doesn’t count. Using MAX per session handles users who visit the same page multiple times. COUNTIF is BigQuery/Redshift-compatible for this use case.
โ†ช Follow-up Questions
  • โ†’ How do you handle sessions where a user visits ProductPage 3 times before adding to cart?
  • โ†’ What if we want funnel rates by device type (mobile vs desktop)?
  • โ†’ How would you build this as a reusable pipeline rather than a one-off query?

Round 2 โ€” Data Modeling & Warehouse Design

BIE III candidates are expected to design scalable, query-optimized data models. Interviewers will give you a business scenario and ask you to design the schema from scratch โ€” tables, grain, keys, partitioning, and distribution strategies.

Question 1: Design an E-commerce Data Warehouse

Design a data warehouse schema for Amazon’s e-commerce platform to support: (1) daily seller performance reports, (2) customer cohort analysis, (3) product category revenue trends, (4) ad spend ROI analysis. What tables, grain, and keys would you define? How would you partition and distribute them in Redshift?

Data Modeling ยท Star Schema ยท Redshift Architecture

Core Fact Tables:

  • fact_orders (order_id, customer_id, seller_id, product_id, date_id, quantity, unit_price, total_revenue, discount_amount, is_returned, is_prime_order) โ€” grain: one row per order-line-item. DISTKEY: seller_id (seller reports join most). SORTKEY: order_date.
  • fact_ad_spend (ad_id, campaign_id, seller_id, date_id, impressions, clicks, spend, conversions, attributed_revenue) โ€” grain: ad-day. DISTKEY: seller_id. SORTKEY: date_id.
  • fact_page_events (session_id, user_id, product_id, date_id, event_hour, event_type, platform) โ€” grain: event. DISTKEY: user_id. SORTKEY: date_id, event_hour. Compressed (ZSTD) for volume.

Dimension Tables (all DISTSTYLE ALL for broadcast joins):

  • dim_date (date_id, full_date, day_of_week, week, month, quarter, year, is_holiday, is_sale_day)
  • dim_customer (customer_id, signup_date, country, tier, is_prime, cohort_month)
  • dim_product (product_id, category, subcategory, brand, launch_date, current_price)
  • dim_seller (seller_id, seller_name, category_focus, country, tier, onboarding_date)

SCD Handling: For price changes, maintain dim_product_history (SCD Type 2) alongside the current dim_product for fast current-state lookups.

Partitioning strategy: Partition fact tables by month in S3 (Spectrum) for historical data (12+ months old). Hot data (last 90 days) stays in Redshift proper for sub-second query performance.

๐ŸŽฏ BIE III Expectation
Level III candidates are expected to justify each design choice โ€” not just name the tables. “DISTKEY on seller_id because seller-level joins are the most common pattern in our query workload” is the kind of reasoning that separates L5/L6 candidates from L4.
โ†ช Follow-up Questions
  • โ†’ How would you handle late-arriving data (orders that are recorded 3 days late due to cross-border processing)?
  • โ†’ Your query latency on fact_orders is degrading. What’s your debugging approach?
  • โ†’ How does your design change if you move from Redshift to Databricks Delta Lake?

Question 2: ETL Pipeline Design โ€” Incremental Loads

You need to build a daily incremental ETL for fact_orders. Source: transactional database with 500M+ rows. Requirements: capture inserts AND updates (order status changes). How do you design the pipeline? What are the failure modes and how do you handle them?

ETL Design ยท Incremental Load ยท Pipeline Resilience

Approach: CDC (Change Data Capture) + UPSERT pattern

Step 1 โ€” Capture changes: Use AWS DMS (Database Migration Service) with CDC mode to stream all INSERT/UPDATE operations from the source RDS into S3 as Parquet files partitioned by `processing_date`. This avoids full table scans on a 500M-row table.

Step 2 โ€” Stage changes: Load CDC Parquet files into a Redshift staging table (stg_orders_delta) with the same schema as fact_orders plus a change_type column (INSERT/UPDATE).

Step 3 โ€” UPSERT into fact table:

-- Merge pattern: delete-then-insert (Redshift doesn't support native MERGE)
BEGIN;
DELETE FROM fact_orders
WHERE order_id IN (SELECT order_id FROM stg_orders_delta);

INSERT INTO fact_orders
SELECT * FROM stg_orders_delta;
COMMIT;

Failure mode handling:

  • Duplicate processing: Store a watermark table (last_processed_timestamp). If the pipeline restarts, re-process from the last committed watermark. The delete-then-insert pattern is idempotent.
  • Late-arriving CDC records: Keep the staging table for 7 days. Run a daily reconciliation job comparing source row counts to Redshift counts for the previous 3 days.
  • Schema drift: Use a schema registry (AWS Glue Data Catalog) and set up alerts on schema change events before they break the pipeline.
  • Pipeline failure mid-run: All staging โ†’ fact operations are wrapped in a transaction. A failed run leaves no partial data in fact_orders.
โ†ช Follow-up Questions
  • โ†’ How do you test this pipeline before deploying to production?
  • โ†’ The CDC stream gets 3 hours delayed due to source DB load. How does this affect your pipeline SLA?
  • โ†’ How would you rewrite this for Databricks using Delta Lake MERGE?

Round 3 โ€” Leadership Principles

At BIE III level, Amazon’s LP bar is set for L5 โ€” you’re expected to show ownership over system-level problems, not just task-level execution. Stories should demonstrate technical leadership: mentoring, architectural decisions, cross-team influence.

LP: Ownership

Tell me about a time you took ownership of a problem that wasn’t technically your responsibility โ€” and drove it to resolution.

LP: Ownership ยท L5 Bar ยท Technical Leadership

L5 Ownership looks like:

  • You identified a systemic failure that was affecting multiple teams โ€” not just your task
  • You volunteered to own the fix even when it required learning new skills or working nights/weekends
  • You built something that persisted beyond your involvement โ€” documentation, automated monitoring, a runbook that prevented future incidents
  • You involved stakeholders strategically โ€” not just “informed” people, but got buy-in for a real fix vs. a patch

Common weak answers: “I stayed late to fix a broken report.” That’s task execution, not ownership. Ownership means you changed the system so that type of failure couldn’t happen again.

Strong answer structure:

  1. Situation: Describe a systemic problem โ€” data quality issue causing wrong decisions, a pipeline that kept failing weekly, a reporting gap that no team owned
  2. Task: Explicitly state why this wasn’t your problem to own โ€” and why you took it anyway
  3. Action: Walk through the investigation, the fix, AND the systemic changes you put in place
  4. Result: Quantify the impact โ€” incidents reduced, hours saved, decisions improved

4-Week Prep Plan for Amazon BIE III

Week 1 โ€” Foundation

Build advanced SQL skills (window functions, recursive CTEs, date range joins, SCD Type 2 patterns), refresh data warehouse design concepts (star schema, Redshift DISTKEY/SORTKEY, partitioning), and read TDM’s DE interview posts.

Week 2 โ€” Analytics Depth + First Mock

Work through the 2200 Most Asked Analytics Interview Questions ebook โ€” focus on SQL, data modeling, and pipeline design sections. At the end of Week 2, book mock interview at topmate.io/nitin_kamal.

Week 3 โ€” SQL Mastery + Second Mock

Complete the Ace Any SQL Interview ebook (link) โ€” all 220 questions, focusing on query optimization patterns. Prepare LP stories for all 6 core principles at L5 bar. Book second mock interview.

Week 4 โ€” System Design + Final Mock

Practice data warehouse design problems from scratch: given a business requirement, design the full schema, ETL, and reporting layer in 30 minutes. Run timed simulations. Final mock interview at end of Week 4.

Target: ~950 questions + 3 mocks + full schema design practice = ready for Amazon’s BIE III bar raiser.

Scroll to Top